ABSTRACT
The global pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) poses a significant threat to public health. Besides humans, SARS-CoV-2 can infect several animal species. Highly sensitive and specific diagnostic reagents and assays are urgently needed for rapid detection and implementation of strategies for prevention and control of the infection in animals. In this study, we initially developed a panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein. To detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a broad spectrum of animal species, a mAb-based bELISA was developed. Test validation using a set of animal serum samples with known infection status obtained an optimal percentage of inhibition (PI) cut-off value of 17.6% with diagnostic sensitivity of 97.8% and diagnostic specificity of 98.9%. The assay demonstrates high repeatability as determined by a low coefficient of variation (7.23%, 6.95%, and 5.15%) between-runs, within-run, and within-plate, respectively. Testing of samples collected over time from experimentally infected cats showed that the bELISA was able to detect seroconversion as early as 7 days post-infection. Subsequently, the bELISA was applied for testing pet animals with COVID-19-like symptoms and specific antibody responses were detected in two dogs. The panel of mAbs generated in this study provides a valuable tool for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics and research. The mAb-based bELISA provides a serological test in aid of COVID-19 surveillance in animals.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Omicron (B.1.1.529) is the most recent SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern (VOC), which emerged in late 2021 and rapidly achieved global predominance in early 2022. In this study, we compared the infection dynamics, tissue tropism and pathogenesis and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 D614G (B.1), Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron BA.1.1 sublineage (B.1.1.529) variants in a highly susceptible feline model of infection. While D614G- and Delta-inoculated cats became lethargic, and showed increased body temperatures between days 1 and 3 post-infection (pi), Omicron-inoculated cats remained subclinical and, similar to control animals, gained weight throughout the 14-day experimental period. Intranasal inoculation of cats with D614G- and the Delta variants resulted in high infectious virus shedding in nasal secretions (up to 6.3 log10 TCID50.ml-1), whereas strikingly lower level of viruses shedding (<3.1 log10 TCID50.ml-1) was observed in Omicron-inoculated animals. In addition, tissue distribution of the Omicron variant was markedly reduced in comparison to the D614G and Delta variants, as evidenced by in situ viral RNA detection, in situ immunofluorescence, and quantification of viral loads in tissues on days 3, 5, and 14 pi. Nasal turbinate, trachea, and lung were the main - but not the only - sites of replication for all three viral variants. However, only scarce virus staining and lower viral titers suggest lower levels of viral replication in tissues from Omicron-infected animals. Notably, while D614G- and Delta-inoculated cats had severe pneumonia, histologic examination of the lungs from Omicron-infected cats revealed mild to modest inflammation. Together, these results demonstrate that the Omicron variant BA.1.1 is less pathogenic than D614G and Delta variants in a highly susceptible feline model.
Subject(s)
Pneumonia , COVID-19 , InflammationABSTRACT
We describe the first cases of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection detected in animals in the United States. In March 2020, four tigers and three lions at the Bronx Zoo developed mild respiratory signs. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by rRT-PCR in respiratory secretions and/or feces from all seven affected animals; viral RNA and/or antibodies were detected in their keepers. SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from respiratory secretions or feces from three affected animals; in situ hybridization co-localized viral RNA with cellular damage. Whole genome sequence and haplotype network analyses showed tigers and lions were infected with two different SARS-CoV-2 strains, suggesting independent viral introductions. The source of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lions is unknown. Epidemiological data and genetic similarities between keeper and tiger viruses indicate human to animal transmission.